Academia.eduAcademia.edu
BLACK GLASS JEWELLERY FROM BRACARA AUGUSTA Mario da Cruz what evidences of local glass production really exist? There is in Bracara Augusta a well documented production of adornment objects in opaque black glass from the Late Roman period. Due to the lack of data from the excavations, it is for the time being not quite possible to forward more precise data as to the chronology of the different jewels. Recent studies in archaeometry (Gratuze, 2001a; Gratuze, 2001b), however, are demonstrating that some of the black jewellery, for long time classified as Iron Age or even Bronze Age is in fact Roman. The modern Portuguese town of Braga is an Augustan foundation and capital of one of the three Roman conventus of the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula. Under Diocletian these three conventus were detached from the province of Tarraconensis to form the new province of Callaecia with Bracara Augusta as its capital. This promotion started a period of great development and prosperity that explains the stimulus given to commerce and craft activities in the city, among which stands out the local glass production, of which black glass jewellery is a small part. The opaque black glass is a clear imitation of jet; a semiprecious material very popular in the region in Roman times. As far as we know, the black glass from Braga was exclusively destined to manufacture small jewellery objects, along with a marginal production of gaming counters, hence there was not a single black vase recorded Cosyns and Hanut (2005) makes clear that the production of vessels in black glass ended around the middle of the 3rd century AD, about a generation before the start of the Braga hey-day). This is not true vice versa, however. Indeed, although the great majority of jewels found in Braga are of black glass, there are also a few examples in other colours, mainly finger rings and beads. Opaque coloured glass, like yellow and blue, was also used for decorative details. But, before describing the Braga material, PRODUCTION In the Southwest part of Bracara Augusta, in an area commonly known as Fujacal, production waste containing black glass can easily be identified within the bulk of cullet. Preliminary studies point in the direction of a profound urban restructuring in this area, at the time of the Late Roman wall construction by the last third of the 3rd century AD. With the exception of the workshop, it is possible to identify all the evidences of black glass jewellery production. Starting from the raw material, there are several lumps of black opaque glass (Fig. 1) that preserve the shape and even chips of the crucible. Fig. 1. Lumps of black glass. The so-called “opaque black glass” is in reality neither opaque nor black when watched 7 AIHV Annales du 17e Congrès, 2007 closely (J. Bayley in Guido 1999; Cosyns et al. 2006). To be considered as true opaque the presence of opacifying agents in the form of crystals is required which is not the case here. On the other hand, if we hold a thin walled chip against the light, we can see some colour and light coming through. In the case of the black glass used in Bracara Augusta it takes on dark green tones, but purple, blue and brown tones are also known (Cosyns, 2005, 113). The opaque black appearance is given by a saturation of colouring agents. Comparative analysis of the chemical composition of black glass and natural coloured blue-green glass from the excavations in Fujacal, Braga (Table 1) revealed that the colouring agent used was iron oxide (Fe2O3), as in most of other known cases (Gratuze, 2001a; Gratuze, 2001b). Some elements, like Copper (CuO) and Lead (PbO), show an unusual high representations and others, like calcium (CaO) and alumina (Al2O3), are of lower content. The different composition of black glass from Braga and S. Vito suggests that the colouring of black glass was done locally. Dealing with small quantities, the fusion was made in small conical crucibles found with black glass in its interior (Fig. 3, 0.0.1). The jewels are of simple crafting. Be it in the case of bracelets, or rings, the technique consisted of dragging and enrolling more or less broad strings like 0.2.1 and 0.2.3 (Figs. 2 and 3), around a stick with the desired diameter, fixing their ends and diluting this seam. In bracelet 1.1.3 and finger rings 2.2.1 and 2.2.3 this seam is very clear. The square beads would follow a similar principle, in which the string is bent and palmed around two little irons at the origin of the two perforations, as you can see in 3.1.3 and 3.1.5. Table 1. Comparative chemical compositions for black and blue-green glass from Braga and a black grooved bracelet from S. Vito al Tagliamento, Italy (Gratuze, 2001a, no. 23). Samples BRA26 and BRA29 from Braga analysed by Bernard Gratuze in IRAMAT, Institut de Recherche sur les Archéomatériaux, Centre Ernest Babelon, C.N.R.S., Orléans. Our special thanks to them. Na2O MgO Al2O3 SiO2 P2O5 Cl K2O CaO MnO Fe2O3 CuO PbO TiO2 Black BRA26 16.7% 0.79% 2.30% 60.4% 0.10% 1.01% 0.39% 5.06% 1.01% 11.4% 0.19% 0.16% 0.11% Blue-green BRA29 14.8% 0.54% 3.12% 70.4% 0,07% 1.11% 0.30% 8.13% 0.71% 0.39% 0.0025% 0.0006% 0.0723% Black N. 23 15.3% 0,.7% 2.65% 64.0% 0.20% 0.97% 0.52% 7.35% 0.76% 7.28% 0.056% 0.030% 0.08% In the case of the spiral-like cylindrical beads, the process was even simpler and consisted of rolling a thread around an iron. In the case of the remaining beads, the technique would be pulling little “pips” or drops, like 0.2.3 and 0.2.4 (Figs. 2 and 3), which would later be perforated and crafted. There are basically two decorative techniques, both hot crafting: the first one consisted of printing simple furrows or stamps; the second was the application of threads of the same or a contrasting colour. THE JEWELS A catalogue of all jewellery in black glass excavated in Braga are listed at the end of this paper. A selection of only the most representative material is illustrated in Fig. 3. The bracelets represent, with 70 % of the registered jewels, the essential part of the production, and were of daily and widespread use. Among these the plain ones are the more abundant and variable in size, closely followed by the grooved ones. This is certainly due to its Fig. 2. Glass production waste: drops and strings. 8 Roman Glass Fig. 3. (Scale ½) Black glass jewellery finds: 0.01 - 0.3.4 evidences of glass production; 1.1.1 - 1.4.1 bracelets; 2.2.1 2.2.6 finger rings; 3.1.1 - 3.5.2 beads; 4.1.1 - 4.2.2 pendants/amulets; 6.1 rough gemstone (for further information go to the list of black glass jewellery finds). simplicity and easy crafting. Less abundant and more elaborate are the stamped ones like the two in Fig. 4. These examples are the only intact ones found in Braga but unfortunately have disappeared (Sousa, 1973, fig. 2). If the daily use of these fragile bracelets is in itself already bizarre, although irrefutable because of the intense patterns of wear shown, the use of finger-rings may have had a more sporadic and ritual character, associated with burials. Among the various complete beads, the square ones are the most original, not so much with regard to their form and decoration but to the fact that they present two longitudinal perforations. In addition to the evidence that they only show Fig. 4. Bracelets and pin. Unknown whereabouts. patterns of wear on the decorated external side, allows us to argue that these are segments of 9 AIHV Annales du 17e Congrès, 2007 bracelets and not collar beads. Parallels for these square beads, as for bracelets, are found in different parts of the Roman Empire but not always correctly classified or dated (see jet material Allason-Jones 1999; Hagen 1937). The spherical plain beads most likely did not have much success, despite their simplicity and proven local production. The cylindrical beads, plain or spiral-formed, still pose an enigma. If on the one hand they are relatively simple forms of easy crafting, on the other hand they are limited to a single piece of each variant. Putting into relation those facts, together with the lack of wear and their shared origin in Fujacal, we might be in the presence of prototypes which were not commercialized. The spherical pendants as well as the elongated ones can be classified as amulets. The spherical ones probably represented fruits: grapes, apple, pomegranate, etc. As to the elongated trailed amulets, it is difficult to determine which object they imitate, or even their exact function. Their use as pendants of a collar is not very probable, due to the fact that they show a sole decentralized loop, in which they differ from known parallels (Nolen, 1994, vi-129 and vi-130). The whereabouts of the only known pin, which is merely registered by the picture in Fig. 4, is unknown, but the colouring and the link with the two bracelets situate it indisputably in the sphere of production of black glass from Braga. What was argued referring to glass rings is also true for this unique piece, which imitates from close up common bone pins. tesserae and also used for decorating cups and jars with glass trails and threads. It is obvious that a production of false gems only makes sense in Braga if there was a market for these fakes (a “cluster”), i.e., one or more workshops of gem cutters and engravers. We think that this workshop could be situated on the Insula of Carvalheiras, from where three out of five imitations of nicolos were found, as well as other intaglios. Curiously, it is from here the major quantity and variety of jet objects ever found in Braga comes. Most likely we are in the presence of a cutting and engraving workshop of jet, gemstones and their imitations in glass, acquired locally. Hence, without the rough gem, imitating nicolos (Figs. 5 and 3, 6.1) found in Fujacal all this would be mere speculation. This important find can be seen as a real “missing link” connecting the glass production from Fujacal, and the engraving of gemstones from Carvalheiras. To strengthen this idea, there emerged, once again in Fujacal, one single genuine nicolos intaglio (Fig. 4, bottom left). Could it have served at any moment as a model? GLASS IMITATION OF NICOLOS If the production of black glass in Braga was aiming at the imitation of jet, it is only natural that the “falsification” temptations did not end here and were extended to precious stones, an intent which after all can not be dissociated from the appearance of glass itself. It is also natural that one of the stones to be imitated was nicolos (a variety of agate), due to the following reasons. First of all because it was one of the most popular and appreciated stones by the Romans, and then because it is relatively simple to forge. In the case of Braga, the two colours necessary for their execution already existed in form of glass lumps: the opaque black of the remaining jewels and the opaque blue of the ones used for the cutting of 10 Fig. 5. From top to bottom: rough gem and similar crafted, genuine nicolo and similar glass imitation. REFERENCES Allason-Jones, L., 1999. The Roman Jet in the Yorkshire Museum. York. Bayley, J., 1999. Appendix notes on the composition of coloured glasses. in: Guido, M. The glass beads of Anglo-Saxon England c. AD Roman Glass Gratuze, B., 2001a. Etude de la composition de bracelets protohistoriques en verre du Museo Civico “Federico de Roco” (S. Vito al Tagliamento, Italie). Orléans, C.N.R.S. (PDF file) Gratuze, B., 2001b. Etude de la composition d’un écarteur de collier en verre de l´Aveyron (Collection B. Tournier, Musée de Gap). Orléans, C.N.R.S. (PDF file) Hagen, W., 1937. ‘Kaiserzeitliche Gagatarbeiten aus dem rheinischen Germanien’. Bonner Jahrbücher 142, 77-144. Nolen, J., 1994. Cerâmicas e vidros de Torre de Ares. Lisboa, IPM. Sousa, J.J.R., 1973. ‘Subsídios para a carta arqueológica de Braga’. Studia Archeologica 23, 7-29. 400-700. A preliminary visual classification of the more definitive and diagnostic types. London, The Society of Antiquaries of London, 89-93. Cosyns, P. and Hanut, F., 2005. ‘Black glass of second to third-century date in northern Gaul: a preliminary survey’. in: Annales du 16e Congrès, de l’AIHV, 113-118. Cosyns, P., Janssens, K., Schalm, O. and Van der Linden, V., 2006. ‘Black glass in the Roman Empire: a work in progress’. in: Creemers, G., Demarsin, B. and Cosyns, P. (eds.) Roman glass in Germania Inferior. Interregional comparisons and recent results. Proceedings of the International conference (Tongeren 2005), Atuatuca 1. Tongeren, Provinciaal GalloRomeins Museum, 30-41. BLACK GLASS JEWELLERY FINDS N. / Form - Inventory no. (site reference) Measurements (thickness = T.; length = L.; width = W.; diameter = D.) / Remarks 0 Evidences of glass production 0.1 Crucible: 0.1.1 - 0959/00 (BRA98FUJ Q1 =141=) Small conical crucible with added black glass 0.2 Waste: 0.2.1 - 0495/01 (BRA98FUJ M,N/25,26 =12=) O-shaped section rectilinear plastic cord 0.2.2 - 0498/01 (BRA98FUJ Q15 =141=) O-shaped section rectilinear plastic cord with a central perforation in the thickest end 0.2.3 - 0449/01 (BRA98FUJ Q20 =16=) No shape nugget/drop with sand marks 0.2.4 - 0474/01 (BRA98FUJ I20,21,22,23 =59=) No shape nugget/drop with sand marks 0.3 Rejections: 0.3.1 - 0475/01 (BRA98FUJ K21,22,23,24=30=) Flat square bead with tooling marks and an obstructed perforation 0.3.2 - 0503/01 (BRA00FUJ Q18 =34=) Misshapen flat square bead with an obstructed perforation 0.3.3 - 0007/06 (BRA96CSF 16 =3=) Unfinished spherical bead 0.3.4 - 0493/01 (BRA98FUJ M,N/25,26 =11=) Distorted finger ring with tool mark 1 Bracelets (all have D-shape section) 1.1 Plain: 1.1.1 - 1162/04 (BRA94SG 405 =3=) D.: 66 mm; T.: 7x15 mm. Intense wear 1.1.2 - 0966/95 (BRA95CSC 6 =1=) D.: c.60 mm; T.: 3.5x6 mm. Little wear 1.1.3 - 0350/94 (BRA93FUJ H12 =67=) D.: c.60 mm; T.: 5x7 mm. Intense wear. Protuberance from the seam 1.1.4 - 1808/92 (BRA92CARV 60 s/c) D.: 60 mm; T.: 5x6.5 mm. Intense wear. Seam visible inside 1.1.5 - 0128/96 (BRA95MIS F13 =13=) D.: c.60 mm; T.: 4x10 mm. Intense wear 1.1.6 - 0954/97 (BRA78SH 2) D.: c.60 mm; T.: 4x14.5 mm. Worn 1.1.7 - 1422/97 (BRA77P 4a) D.: c.70 mm; T.: 5x7 mm. Intense wear 1.1.8 - 0076/00 (BRA96ECS 35 «3») D.: c.70 mm; T.: 5x6 mm. Intense wear 1.1.9 - 0953/97 (BRA78S 1) D.: c.60 mm; T.: 4x7 mm. Intense wear 1.1.10 - 0951/97 (BRA77Q 1), D. indeterminable; T.: 6.5x11 mm. Intense wear 1.1.11 - 0944/97 (BRA77A 6d) D.: 70 mm; T.: 7x8 mm. Soft wear. O section, not D 1.1.12 - 0064/00 (BRA91CVL 91) D.: 70 mm; T.: 6.5x10 mm. Worn 1.1.13 - 0077/00 (BRA77A 7B) D.: 70 mm; T.: 5x7 mm. Worn 1.1.14 - 0078/00 (BRA77E 7) D.: c. 50.5 mm; T.: 5x8 mm. Little wear 1.1.15 - 0078/97 (BRA91CARV31 «fossa») D.: 80 mm; T.: 5x7 mm. Worn 1.1.16 - 1385/96 (BRA92CARV 71) D.: 70 mm; T.: 6x11 mm. Intense wear 1.1.17 - 0150/97 (BRA95T 19b =0=) D.: 70 mm; T.: 6x15 mm. Intense wear 11 AIHV Annales du 17e Congrès, 2007 1.1.18 - 0004/06 (FALPERRA70I 3E6) D.: 75 mm; T.: 6x15 mm. Worn 1.1.19 - 0222/92 (BRA92CARV 78 =2=) D.: 55 mm; T.: 2.5x3 mm. Lack of wear. Extremely thin 1.1.20 - 1384/96 (BRA91CVL x164y156) D.: 65 mm; T.: 5x7 mm. Little wear 1.1.21 - 1459/98 (BRA97ALB E7 =156=) D.: 65 mm; T.: 5x6,5 mm. Little wear 1.1.22 - 0071/00 (BRA97FUJ Q21 =109=) D.: 60 mm; T.: 7x10 mm. Intense wear 1.1.23 - 0496/01 (BRA97FUJ Q21 =65=) D.: 65 mm; T.: 6x7 mm. Little wear 1.2 Grooved: 1.2.1 - 0072/00 (BRA84CARV x152y132=1391=) D.: c. 60 mm; T.: 5x9 mm. Intense wear 1.2.2 - 0075/00 (BRA66MAX X) D. Indeterminable; T.: 5x10 mm. Little wear 1.2.3 - 1204/96 (BRA96SST K20 =25=) D.: 80 mm; T.: 5.5x9-11.5 mm. Worn. Irregular thickness 1.2.4 - 1205/96 (BRA96SST K20 =38=) D.: 70 mm; T.: 6x12 mm. Soft wear. C shaped arch grooves 1.2.5 - 0945/97 (BRA77A 6G) D.: 60 mm; T.: 5x9.5 mm. Worn. Spaced deep grooves 1.2.6 - 0955/97 (BRA88CVL x136y160 =2=) D.: 50 mm; T.: 6.5x12 mm. Worn. Deep grooves 1.2.7 - 0950/97 (BRA77B 16) D.: 70 mm; T.: 4.5x7,5 mm. Intense wear. Thin oblique grooves 1.2.8 - 1278/97 (BRA79Pb 10d «2») D.: 45 mm; T.: 4x8 mm. Intense wear. Closed and shallow grooves 1.2.9 - 0065/00 (BRA77A 25C) D.: 60 mm; T.: 7,5x13 mm. Intense wear. Grooves with a tool perforation mark 1.2.10 - 0066/00 (BRA98T 118 =2=) D.: 60 mm; T.: 5x9 mm. Worn 1.2.11 - 1012/04 (BRA04TR UE500) D.: 65 mm; T.: 5x11 mm. Worn 1.2.12 - 0946/97 (BRA77A 10A s/c) D.: 60 mm; T.: 5x10 mm. Worn. Silky inside surface 1.2.13 - 1421/97 (BRA77P 4A s/c) D.: 65 mm; T.: 4.5x8 mm. Worn. Shiny surface 1.2.14 - 0074/00 (BRA78C 1 s/c) D.: 50 mm; T.: 5.5x9,5 mm. Intense wear. Deep closed grooves 1.2.15 - 0004/02 (BRA88PAÇO E2 =323=) D.: 65 mm; T.: 4x9.5 mm. Intense wear. Soft irregular grooves 1.3 Stamped: 1.3.1 - 0073/00 (BRA94SG203 =3=) D.: 60 mm; T.: 6.5x11,5 mm. Worn. Oval stamping 1.3.2 - 0127/96 (BRA95MIS F13 =13=) D.: 65 mm; T.: 10x14 mm. Intense wear. Oval stamping 1.3.3 - Not found (BRA X) Whole stamped bracelet. Unknown whereabouts (Fig. 4) 1.3.4 - Not found (BRA X) Whole stamped bracelet with central depression. Unknown whereabouts (Fig. 4) 1.4 Trails: 1.4.1 - 0220/92 (BRA92CARV 74 =7=) D.: 80 mm; T.: 8x10.5 mm. Worn. Fused opaque yellow sneak-thread trails 1.4.2 - 0472/01 (BRA98FUJ I20,21,22,23 =59=) D.: 75 mm; T.: 5x9 mm. Worn. Fused opaque green sneak-thread trails 2 Finger rings 2.1 Simple: 2.1.1 - 0541/97 (BRA96SE V31 «sep. 6») D.: 18 mm; T.: 1.5x3 mm. Little wear. Complete 2.1.2 - 0926/97 (BRA97Tb10I =2=) D.: indeterminable; T.: 3 mm. O-shaped section, irregular thickness 2.2 – With a central setting: 2.2.1 - 0003/00 (BRA00MAX Sep1) D.: 16 mm; T.: 2x4.5 mm. D-shaped section, central setting showing a rosette shape stamp 2.2.2 - 0002/ 00 (BRA00MAX Sep1) D.: 17 mm; T.: 2x4.5mm. Soft wear. D-shaped section, central setting missing 2.2.3 - 0484/01 (BRA98FUJ L13 =102=) D.: 17 mm; T.: 2x4 mm. Intense wear. D-shaped section, small and rude central setting 2.2.4 - 0952/97 (BRA78Pb 1 «01») D.: 15 mm; T.: 3 mm. Worn. O-shaped section, small round central setting 2.2.5 - 2154/99 (BRA97TB 10I) D. indeterminable; T.: 3.5 mm. Little wear. O-shaped section, small round central setting 2.2.6 - 0067/00 (BRA77Q 2) D.: 15 mm; T.: 3x7 mm. D-shaped section, oval central setting 3 Beads 3.1.Flat square with double perforation: 3.1.1 - 0276/97 (BRA76GE 451) W.: 11 mm; L.: 11 mm; T.: 4 mm. Little wear. Net of 4x2 grooves 3.1.2 - 0202/0 (BRA93CARV98) W.: 11 mm; L.: 11 mm; T.: 5 mm. Worn. Net of 7x1 grooves 3.1.3 - 0453/01 (BRA97FUJ G22 =22=) W.: 17 mm; L.: 17 mm; T.: 5 mm. Worn. Net of 3x6 grooves 3.1.4 - 0490/01 (BRA98FUJ M,N25,26 =11=) W.: 15 mm; L.: 14 mm; T.: 4.5 mm. Lack of wear. Net of 5x2 grooves 3.1.5 - 0088/03 (BRA02CARV Leste25 503) W.: 15 mm; L.: 13 mm; T.: 4 mm. Worn. Net of 7x2 grooves 3.2 Plain spherical: 3.2.1 - 1243/96 (BRA96CSF 12 =6=) W.: 13 mm; L.: 13,5 mm. Little wear 3.2.2 - 0227/92 (BRA92CARV 82 =1=) W.: 8,5 mm; L.: 5 mm. Little wear 12 Roman Glass 3.3 Decorated spherical: 3.3.1 - 0502/01 (BRA00FUJ Q18 =36=) W.: 12.6 mm; L.: 14 mm. Split surface. Opaque yellowish white zigzag 3.3.2 - 0016/02 (BRA X) W.: 19 mm; L.: 14 mm. Split surface. White and light blue eyes 3.3.3 - 0942/97 (BRA MAX) W.: c.15 mm; L.: 8 mm. Fused irregular opaque white trail 3.4 Cylinder: 3.4.1 - 0501/01 (BRA00FUJ Q18 =34=) W.: 4 mm; L.: 10.8 mm. Little wear. Square section 3.4.2 - 0494/01 (BRA98FUJ M,N/25,26 =11=) W.: 5.5 mm; L.: 10 mm. Lack of wear. O section 3.5 Thread cylinder: 3.5.1 - 0491/01 (BRA98FUJ M,N/25,26 =11=) W.: 6 mm; L.: 9.5 mm. Lack of wear. Spiral twisted thread 3.5.2 - 0492/01 (BRA98FUJ M,N/25,26 =11=) W.: 4.5 mm; L.: 11 mm. Lack of wear. Thin spiral twisted thread 4 Pendants/Amulets 4.1 Spherical pendants: 4.1.1 - 0008/06 (BRA93FUJ H12 =51=) W.: 20 mm; L.: c .30 mm. Worn. Broken loop 4.1.2 - 0073/05 (BRA X) W.: 24 mm; L.: c.32 mm. Lack of wear. Broken loop 4.1.3 - 0009/06 (BRA96SST H14 =8=) W.: 18 mm; L.: c.23 mm. Intense weathering. Broken loop, navel 4.1.4 - 0309/06 (BRA06TR.PSN303UE712) W.: 19 mm; L. 23 mm. Worn yet intact 4.2 Trailed amulets: 4.2.1 - 1065/96 (BRA96SST H12 =8=) W.: 11 mm; L.: 44 mm. Worn. Split spiral opaque yellow trails 4.2.2 - 0930/97 (BRA95SG 402 =7=) W.: 7 mm; Preserved L.: 30 mm. Little wear. Spiral trails. 5 Pin 5.1 - Not found (BRA X) Pin with faceted head. Unknown whereabouts (Fig. 4) 6 Man-made rough gemstone 6.1 - 0482/01 (BRA98FUJ L13 =101=) W.: 10 mm; T.: 3.5 mm. Black and opaque blue rough gem, imitating nicolos. MARIO DA CRUZ Largo de Santa Barbara 4, 3 esq., PT-1150-287 Lisbon, Portugal e-mail: mariodacruz@hotmail.com 13